Illustration: A scale in the sea, in one scale pan is industry and hangs low, in the other scale pan are trees floating above.

Not Just Us: Lessons From the Global South

While “degrowth” has become a popular slogan in the rich countries of the global north, the true pioneers of degrowth are the native and indigenous people of the Americas, Africa, and Asia, many of whom can teach us how to live in harmony with nature, without destroying it.

In an influential book, the American political theorist David Schlosberg1 argues for the inclusion of democracy, recognition, and human capabilities into considerations about environmental protection. He suggests framing this issue as one of ecology, which includes human communities, not just environmental protection. He also suggests moving beyond conceptions of mere distributional justice to more complex political and moral treatments of ecological justice.

Rethinking the relationship between humans and their environment seems indeed urgent, considering the current climate crisis. Just to be sure, a global warming of just 2 degrees Celsius will lead to extreme draughts, increased numbers of hurricanes and tornados, floods, and extended wildfires in many regions of the globe. Food and water shortages are inevitable with only a 2-degree warming – and there currently is no indication suggesting that we will be able to control global warming and keep it under 2 degrees Celsius.

Consciously Destroying

The species loss we are already witnessing in the world is unprecedented.2 Following Schlosberg, we must start thinking of ourselves as part of an ecosystem that includes not just us, but other species, plants, rivers, mountains, oceans, and seas. Of all the components sharing this global ecosystem, which is made up by many local ecosystems, humans are the only ones who consciously destroy their own habitat.

Worse, by destroying our habitat, we also destroy the habitats of all the other components of the world. Urgent action to reverse the current trend of destruction is needed.

During the 2015 Paris Climate Summit, 196 countries agreed to take measures to keep global warming under 2 degrees. Today, most of the countries who signed this agreement are not on track to keep their promise. Our global addiction to consumption and our single-minded focus on economic expansion stand in the way of securing our long-term survival on this planet. We currently consume 1.6 times the resources of our planet – every year.3

With this scenario in mind, the question becomes: what can be done?

I want to suggest that we can all learn valuable lessons from some countries and communities of the Global South. Opening the eyes, listening and learning from the Global South, at this time in human history, is of particular relevance.

It is time to listen, carefully, what the former colonized have to say.

It promises to bring new perspectives and experiences to a debate that is of global reach, but has been discussed, to a great extent, among a select group of specialists, most of whom from the Global North and trained in metropolitan universities. Most of our environmental problems, however, stem from a model of development that has been created and then forced upon the world by exactly those same specialists, associated with and affiliated to international organizations and driving an agenda of worldwide “development.”

The current debate about climate change and environmental justice is tainted by the long shadow of colonialism. It is time to listen, carefully, what the former colonized have to say.

The Mexican thinker Gustavo Esteva4 (A Critique of Development and Other Essays, 2022) was among the most respected voices critiquing the very idea of development. To him, development divides people into rich and poor and it reduces people whose lives are fulfilled and happy to “the poor,” simply because they do not partake significantly in monetary transactions.

Such a model, says Esteva, can only lead to disaster, as it elevates market transactions to the highest goal of human strive. It is precisely the reduction of the human experience to monetary exchange that is at the core of our current climate crisis. We need a new way of thinking about the future, beyond growth and economic expansion.

Innovation to protect the environment and limit pollution and carbon emissions can be found among some of the big cities of the Global South.

And while “degrowth” has become a popular slogan in the rich countries of the global north, the true pioneers of degrowth are the native and indigenous people of the Americas, Africa, and Asia, many of whom can teach us how to live in harmony with nature, without destroying it. Innovation to protect the environment and limit pollution and carbon emissions can also be found among some of the big cities of the Global South.

São Paulo, the biggest city of South America with a metropolitan population of over 21 million, has long limited private and commercial car traffic. Since 1995, the megacity issues restrictions on the number of cars able to circulate its roads by outlawing certain number plates on certain days, during peek hours. Every day, a different plate number is prohibited from circulating, leading to an average reduction of 20 percent in city traffic. Mexico City, with a similar population than São Paulo, also has imposed a similar restriction on the circulation of cars – depending on the number plate.

Bogotá, Cali and Medellín

Black and white image: A man is riding a bicycle along a street.
Opening streets to cyclists and walkers will reduce overall pollution and allow for healthy usage of the urban infrastructure, photo: Julian Drov via unsplash

Bogotá, Cali, and Medellín, the three biggest cities of Colombia, close their inner-city highways every Sunday to cars and open them to cyclists, rollerbladers, runners, and walkers, thus reducing overall pollution and allowing for a different, healthy, and healing usage of urban infrastructure, which also fosters human sociability, as citizens can meet and come together in these public spaces, normally reserved for automobile traffic.

India, New Zealand, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Canada have all allowed for certain rivers, or for nature in general, to become legal persons, which has facilitated the defense of their rights and increased their legal protection. The idea of environmental personhood has deep roots in Native and indigenous American thinking and practice, as for many First People of the Americas, the earth is sacred and considered a mother to us all.

The Bolivian Law of the Rights of Mother Earth was passed in 2010, defining Earth as a “a collective subject of public interest." Once invested with rights, protections can be legislated and legal actions can be taken to ensure the wellbeing of a natural entity, or nature in general.

India, New Zealand, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Canada have all allowed for certain rivers, or for nature in general, to become legal persons, which has facilitated the defense of their rights and increased their legal protection.

As corporations have long been recognized as legal persons with rights and protections, the goal of recognizing nature, or parts thereof, as legal entities is to achieve similar goals as corporations already have attained. By giving nature the same legal character as a corporation, advocates hope that the interests of corporations can be counterbalanced by the interests of nature.

After all, pollution caused by corporations is in most cases socialized and carried by the taxpaying collective, whereas the profits of these same corporations are distributed to shareholders only. Corporations also take advantage of infrastructure and protection paid for by the collective and ensured by the state. If a river, a mountain, a sand dune, a lake, an ocean, or nature in general could count on the same support and public investment as corporations currently do, we would be much better of as a collective.

Paying Parents

In Costa Rica, Colombia, and Brazil, for example, schemes of payments for ecosystem services have been enacted, offering payments to communities who actively engage in the protection of their natural habitat, inspired by the success of programs that pay parents for keeping their young children in school.5 While controversial, these payment schemes recognize that people do not destroy the environment frivolously and without reason. They do so driven by need, to earn money. Paying them for not destroying the environment and for actively protecting it can transform them from agents of destruction to agents of protection.

Brazil has long created Areas of Environmental Protections (APAs) that represent a mixed form of land usage, between a reservation and an area open to commercial use. People who traditionally lived in an APA can still live there and earn their livelihoods in this area, as long as they steer clear of predatory and environmentally damaging practices. This has allowed some indigenous groups as well as some traditional communities to continue practicing their way of life in a sustainable way.

 

A jar with coins from which a plant grows out.
People do not destroy the environment frivolously and without reason. They do so driven by need, to earn money, photo: Towfiqu Barbhuiya via unsplash

Papua New Guinea has long enacted a law that prohibits the killing of some of its protected species, but it allows traditional communities to hunt those species using traditional methods, meaning with bows and arrows or with a blowgun, during specific times of the year.

By enacting such laws, these countries have acted on the understanding that traditional usage of nature and the environment is not the problem and not the cause of its destruction. It is the unbound and limitless commercial usage of natural resources and of nature in general that is rapidly destroying our world.

This is nowhere clearer than in the world of offshore commercial fishing. Without the creation of protected areas, where marine life can safely reproduce, life in the world’s oceans is doomed. Commercial fishing has already destroyed 90 percent of the world’s larger fishes and sea mammals.6

It has also forced poverty on traditional coastal fishermen and women who can no longer catch enough fish to survive. If a commercial super fisher catches and kills all the fish just outside of a country’s national jurisdiction, nothing is left for local fishermen who fish in coastal waters.

Commercial fishing has already destroyed 90 percent of the world’s larger fishes and sea mammals.

Many of these fishermen, for example in West Africa, once they lose their livelihoods, are then pushed into abandoning their homes, further fueling the international migration crisis at the borders of Europe.

Environmental issues are not isolated problems. They are connected to larger social and political problems, and they pose ethical challenges. Commercial fishing destroying local livelihoods or selling and marketing toxic goods in the Global North but having them produced in the Global South and dumping them there after they no longer work is just the tip of the environmental injustice iceberg of today’s global commodity chains.

To secure our collective survival, we must start to think in terms of a shared, and fragile, ecosystem that is the home of all species, along with all plants, minerals, and things of this world. When searching for possible solutions to our global ecological crisis, innovations from the Global South must be considered, as many of them grow out of practices that have proven successful in protecting the environment and other species for millennia. If we want to secure our collective survival on this planet, we must change the ways we approach the environment and stop reducing it to a resource. As Native and Indigenous people of the Americas have long known: humans are part of an ecosystem on which we depend and for which we are responsible.

Once the pollution of our industries has killed all the bees, plant reproduction will be disrupted. The devastation that deep sea fishing and pollution has wrought to our oceans must be limited for oceans to survive and be able to fulfill their function. After all: According to the United Nations the ocean generates 50 percent of the oxygen we need, absorbs 25 percent of all carbon dioxide emissions, and captures 90 percent of the excess heat generated by these emissions. “It is not just 'the lungs of the planet' but also its largest 'carbon sink.'”7

The most promising solutions on how to achieve environmental justice and sustainability come from the Global South; from societies and communities that have a long history of resistance against northern models of “development.” It is high time to listen and learn from these communities. In the words of Davi Kopenawa, a Yanomami chief:

"The white people's thought is full of ignorance. They constantly devastate the land they live on and transform the waters they drink into quagmires! There is only one sky and we must take care of it, for if it becomes sick, everything will come to an end."8

Citations and Weblinks

1. Definition von Umweltgerechtigkeit: Theorien, Bewegungen und Natur, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007

2.  https://www.iucn.org/resources/issues-brief/species-and-climate-change

3. https://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/the-human-footprint#:~:text=It%20takes%20a%20year%20and,the%20renewable%20resources%20we%20use.

4. Eine Kritik der Entwicklung und andere Essays, 2022

5. https://www.iied.org/markets-payments-for-environmental-services

6. https://www.theworldcounts.com/challenges/planet-earth/oceans/overfishing-statistics

7. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/ocean#:~:text=The%20ocean%20generates%2050%20percent,the%20impacts%20of%20climate%20change.

8. Davi Kopenawa Yanomami: "Die Menschen im Westen leben zusammengepfercht, rasend wie Wespen im Nest." Interview mit John Vidal, www.theguardian.com. 30. Dezember 2014.

About the Author
Portrait of Bernd Reiter
Bernd Reiter
Professor of Comparative Politics at Texas Tech University

Bernd Reiter is Professor of Comparative Politics at Texas Tech University. Before joining academia, he was an NGO consultant in Brazil and Colombia. His work focuses on democracy and citizenship.

A selection of books:

  • Decolonizing the Social Sciences and Humanities: An Anti-Elitism Manifesto. Routledge, London 2021
  • Legal Duty and Upper Limits: How to Save our Democracy and Planet from the Rich. Anthem Press, 2020
  • Constructing the Pluriverse. The Geopolitics of Knowledge. Duke University Press, 2018
  • The Crisis of Liberal Democracy and the Path Ahead. Alternatives to Political Representation and Capitalism. Rowman & Littlefield International, London 2017
  • Bridging Scholarship and Activism. Reflections from the Frontlines of Collaborative Research. Michigan State University Press, 2014
  • The Dialectics of Citizenship.Exploring Privilege, Exclusion, and Racialization. Michigan State University Press, 2013

Culture Report Progress Europe

Culture has a strategic role to play in the process of European unification. What about cultural relations within Europe? How can cultural policy contribute to a European identity? In the Culture Report Progress Europe, international authors seek answers to these questions. Since 2021, the Culture Report is published exclusively online.